Report: ESPN Laying Off 10% of Workforce

by Breitbart Feed on May 21, 2013

ESPN is reportedly laying off 400 employees–or roughly 10% of its workforce–on Tuesday. 

According to a report that originated on TheBigLead.com and the Gawker-owned sports rumor site Deadspin – and picked up by other outlets like Variety and Business Insider, ESPN will lay off up to 400 employees today.  These are the first major lay-offs at the Connecticut based sports network since 2009, and the move caught employees at the high profile and highly profitable network totally off-guard.

In a statement, ESPN said: 

We are implementing changes across the company to enhance our continued growth while smartly managing costs. While difficult, we are confident that it will make us more competitive, innovative and productive.

ESPN is part of the Disney empire, and reports are that Disney has directed ESPN to improve its profit margins, a directive that has been sent to other Disney divisions as well. ESPN has been investing a large amount of money buying up rights fees recently, including football and basketball deals with major conferences. And according to Deadspin, those fees have put the drag on the margins. They quote one of the laid off workers, who was following Deadspin’s coverage, as follows

I was laid off from ESPN today after 9 and a half years. Completely out of the blue, no warning at all. I was told it was 10% across the board, which would be roughly 400. I was told the reason was they needed to make their profit margin and they chose to do that via layoff of staff. (snip) 

btw…..we were told that the layoffs ARE tied to the profit margin that ESPN needs to meet and the fact they haven’t met that number. Your comments about them buying all of these live rights and now needed to reduce overhead costs is dead on.

There are some conflicting reports on the nature of the lay-offs, with some reporting a 10% across the board cut, while Deadspin’s source indicates the cuts are primarily in one department:

The majority of the layoffs today and tomorrow are in Technology…something like 40 people, at least that’s what I’ve heard. All three HR people assigned to Technology are handling layoffs today and tomorrow. No idea what is going on in the other departments. 

The network has come under fire from conservatives in the past few weeks for using coverage of the Boston Marathon bombing as an excuse to become a promotional tool for President Barack Obama, and for overhyping the coming out of basketball player Jason Collins after initially being criticized for not reporting on it more quickly. It is highly unlikely that any of these layoffs reflect any audience or revenue bleeding as a result of those two incidents. It is also worth noting that reporter Chris Broussard, who openly professed his Christian based objection to homosexuality at the time of Collin’s announcement, has had his profile increased at the network in the past week. 

Fox Sports 1, the 24-hour all-sports cable channel, is set to debut this summer to challenge ESPN. 

    



{ 0 comments }

Not really. 

The IRS had little interest in 501(c)(4) political activities until the 2002 McCain-Feingold campaign-finance reform. That law barred dedicated political-advocacy groups from soliciting and spending soft money—funds that aren’t subject to tight federal campaign-contribution limits and are used for issue advocacy and party-building. 

Yet McCain-Feingold had the unintended effect of making 501(c)(4) political activities far more important than they had been, since the law’s ban on soft money doesn’t apply to such groups.

Before McCain-Feingold, what was the situation with 501c4′s? “virtually all politically active (c)(4)s, mostly labor and environmental groups, were ideologically liberal and their activities were not attacked in the mainstream media or by the political establishment.”

And there you go. 

In response to The Citizens United obsession.

    



{ 0 comments }

credit card machine

We’ve all been there –– a perfect moment shattered by the disgrace of a declined credit card.

Maybe it was a flawless date  romantic ambiance, carefree banter, flirty eyes  ruined by that record-scratching moment when your waiter tells you in hushed tones that your credit card “didn’t go through.”

Or maybe it was that celebratory vacation halted by the aggravating inconvenience of a credit card paralyzed at the worst possible moment. Cruising around the south of France is not so possible when your card is denied at the rental car office. This hiccup might make you blush … or blow a gasket.

Either way, these are cringe-worthy moments we’d all prefer to avoid. And we can. It’s easy enough to sidestep these deflating episodes by employing a few practical tips. Here are nine reasons why your credit card issuer would freeze you out and what you can do to prevent these blunders in the future.

9) You are making an international purchase

If you decide to book a last-minute deal to Europe, you need to make sure your credit company is in on the plans, too. If not, any international purchases could suspend your card.

“We recommend that customers alert us of their plans to travel internationally, and we will take that into account when monitoring for potential fraud,” says Betty Riess, a spokeswoman for Bank of America.

Even an online purchase to a foreign country could raise an alert and stall your credit card, says Linda Sherry, director of national priorities at Consumer Action. Let’s say you’re sitting in your own home office, surfing the Internet for a gift.

You find the perfect item  a designer scarf. But if that online merchant is based in a foreign country, your activity will be registered as a purchase abroad, and once again, your credit card may not work.

Credit card companies track their customers’ card activity. A quick call to your issuer, alerting it to international purchases or travel, can clear the air.

8) Your purchase triggered fraud protection

Besides international purchases, certain “suspicious” activity can lock down your credit card. Sherry says purchasing items such as large electronics or jewelry may raise an alert.

“(These are) things that would be unusual and the things a thief would do if they got ahold of your card,” says Sherry.

It may be a hassle to find your dream flat-screen television only to get denied at the register, but this is your credit card company’s fraud protection program in action.

“Credit card issuers lose millions to fraud every year, so they’re very sensitive when your spending pattern changes,” says John Ulzheimer, president of consumer education at SmartCredit.com. “They just want to be sure it’s a legitimate charge.”

That’s not to say these indulgences are off-limits to your credit card. You can still splurge on that diamond necklace  just call your credit card company and notify it of your purchase.

And if there is fraudulent activity, the issuer will disable your card and send you a new one. It won’t close your account, and this will have no effect on your credit score, says Ulzheimer.

7) You’ve reached your credit limit

Your credit limit caps your spending on your credit card. Once you reach it, you’re cut off. Track your spending and try capping it to below 30 percent of your credit limit to ensure you don’t exceed it. Repeatedly going up to your credit limit could hurt your credit score.

The exception: “If you’re a person who pays in full every month, these rules don’t apply as much, (but) if you’re running a balance month after month, it’s going to trigger a detrimental credit score,” says Sherry.

To keep your credit card in play once you’ve reached the limit, pay down your balance or request an increase to your credit limit.

Some credit cards also have per-day spending limits. To avoid freezes to your credit card, find out your daily maximum, and keep your purchases in line.

6) Info you entered doesn’t match your records

In your haste to purchase that dream espresso machine online, you may have mistyped your credit card number, expiration date, security code or other important identifying figures. An oversight as small as a mistyped or outdated billing address can also interfere with your credit card going through. If you’re making an online purchase, give your information a quick second glance.

If you make this mistake just once, it won’t freeze your account. “It will just restrict this purchase,” says Sherry. But if you mess up your entry numerous times, “it might get rejected and go back to the credit card company, and it will freeze the account.” This is all part of how credit card companies aim to stop fraud.

Sometimes the information doesn’t match because you’ve changed addresses. Call your credit card company to verify your information. A mismatch can cause a hiccup in all purchases that require an address. Avoid future inconveniences by updating your profile with your new information whenever there’s a change.

5) You missed credit card payments

This is an obvious one, but if you’ve been too busy to realize you’ve fallen behind on payments, you must get caught up before your card will work again. The number of cycles you can go past due before your issuer shuts you down varies by credit card and by your history, but Ulzheimer says, as a general rule of thumb, the spottier your history, the shorter your leash.

“If you have a pretty decent history with the issuer, they may actually allow you to go a whole cycle past due before they shut you down,” says Ulzheimer. “If you have a spotty history  meaning you miss payments all the time  you’ll already be on a short leash, and they won’t let you go past one cycle.” Customers with a checkered history will need to pay off their past-due amount so they are no longer delinquent.

Missing your credit card payments will hurt you beyond simply having your credit card declined.

“If you’re consistently delinquent, the limit could be lowered,” says Nessa Feddis, vice president and senior counsel to the American Bankers Association. But again, treatment varies based on each customer’s past behavior. “It’s not like you’ll miss one payment and you’re cut off. It has to be sustained delinquency.”

4) Your credit report has taken a hit

Good standing with one credit card is not enough. Behind the scenes, issuers check in on your credit to see how you are performing in other parts of your credit life, says Ulzheimer.

“They’re looking at your credit report to see if there’s anything on the report that they feel makes you an unacceptable credit risk,” he says. So even if you’re current on one card’s payments, your standing with that card could suffer if a new collection hits your credit report or you default on another credit card.

While recent revisions to credit card laws have drawn some limits on how credit card companies can react to changes in your credit report, they can still pull your information from credit agencies as often as they like, and based on what they see, they can “determine if they still want to do business with you under those same terms” you signed up with, says Ulzheimer.

If you’re a risky customer and your card issuer wants to make changes to your terms, such as your interest rate, it must provide a 45-day notice.

“If your credit history has declined, then your (credit) limit may be reduced,” says Feddis.

3) Your card has expired

When life gets hectic, you may forget to check the expiration date on your credit card. Or maybe you overlooked the new credit card sitting in that pile of mail you need to get through.

Your new card “may be coming in a very nondescript, antiseptic, benign envelope,” says Ulzheimer. “Be careful not to throw it in the shredder.”

Keep an eye out for your new credit card about three to six months in advance of your expiration date because by then, the issuer has made the decision of whether or not it wants to renew your account, says Ulzheimer.

If you can’t find your new card, call your credit card company to make sure nobody is racking up fraudulent charges.

If your credit card company decided not to issue you a new card, you’ll get a letter that explains your options for paying off your remaining balance.

2) You forgot to pay attention on a trip

Is there a note in your recent-purchase list saying the issuer will put a hold for X amount on your account? That reminder should be a red flag for your wallet.

Your card can be declined if you have a pending hold on your account. “This often happens when people are on vacation and they’ve done two things within moments of each other: They’ve gotten a rental car … and then they’ve just checked in to a hotel,” says Melinda Opperman, senior vice president at Springboard Nonprofit Consumer Credit Management. Both of these activities put a hold on a certain portion of a card’s limit.

Traveling and only using one card for your entire vacation can be problematic, especially if you could easily reach your limit. One or two big purchases or holds, and your card will be declined.

“A lot of people aren’t aware of that, and they’re caught off guard,” says Opperman. “It can take several days for the hold to be released,” which is why Opperman advises travelers to bring two credit cards. Switch off between them for hotels, rental car check-ins, dining and other expenses while you’re away.

1) Another user deactivated your card

If the primary cardholder made changes to the account without an authorized user’s knowledge, the user’s card could be declined. The cardholder may have reported his card lost or stolen, in which case the card issuer would typically deactivate all cards under that account while it sends a new one, says Opperman.

Passing along information about changes to your card’s status is essential when sharing a credit card with others, especially if you’re the primary cardholder making decisions that affect other users. Opperman says that sometimes primary cardholders fail to relay important decisions.

“Sometimes these authorized users will try to use their card, and then they’ll find out, ‘Oh my gosh, the cardholder removed me, or the card was deactivated and they didn’t inform me.’” Like in any relationship, communication is key.

SEE ALSO: How To Avoid Money Disasters While Traveling Abroad

Please follow Your Money on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

{ 0 comments }

girls, women, gen y, millennials, happyEntrepreneurs who want to be digital disruptors should pay more attention to how they use tech, says James McQuivey, vice president of Forrester Research. 

During a conference held at New York’s Internet Week on Monday, the business man said women approach technology with a practical mindset. Whereas men are too focused on passion, women tend to see things from the customer’s angle and ask, “What’s in this for me?” This makes them in tune with their market and better able to serve its needs.

“Seeing the need on the other end of the technology, not the technology,” is crucial to being a digital disruptor, explained McQuivey. “Men can genuinely say they love their technology,” but “it gives us the desire to seek new things to love and to be content with their flaws.”  

On the other hand, women “use technology,” but do not love it. Instead, they’re more focused on getting things done, connecting to people, and managing resources. It’s for these reasons they’re helping tech to evolve and become more user-friendly. 

McQuivey also pointed out women tend to be better than men at creating product experiences, which are crucial to digital products and services.

Do you agree that women are pushing technology farther?

Please follow Careers on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

{ 0 comments }

Outgoing Chief Admits IRS Targeting ‘Partisan’

by Breitbart Feed on May 21, 2013

In Tuesday’s testimony before the Senate, outgoing IRS chief Steve Miller apparently reversed course under some tough questioning by Republican Senator Richard Burr of North Carolina. During his testimony last week, Miller not only insisted that the singling out of conservative Tea Party groups for paralyzing harassment was not political but that it wasn’t even targeting.

During his testimony today, Miller not only stopped objecting to the use of the word “targeting,” but seemed to agree with Burr that the targeting was in fact partisan.


Miller: The second listing … in the Treasury Inspector General’s report is still problematic because it talks about policy positions, but it actually is not particularly partisan in how it talks about policy positions.

Sen. Richard Burr: So it was partisan before, though.

Miller: Yes, it absolutely was.

Transcript and video via Twitchy.

 

Follow John Nolte on Twitter @NolteNC

    



{ 0 comments }

The Citizens United obsession

May 21, 2013

In response to Dems Still Trying to Make IRS Scandal About Citizens United: At the Wall Street Journal, Justice Department veterans David Rivkin and Lee Casey discuss how Citizens United loomed large in the Left’s imagination, even as the IRS…

Read the full article →

Here’s What The ‘Arrested Development’ Cast Has Been Up To During The Hiatus

May 21, 2013

Yesterday, we featured the new Arrested Development trailer, but since May 26th can’t come soon enough, here are the 10 funniest projects the cast has been involved in since the hiatus.Will Arnett had a recurring role as Jack D…

Read the full article →

Customer Leaves A Surprise $1,000 Tip So Waitress Can Take A Dream Vacation

May 21, 2013

waitress

A waitress who mentioned to a first-time customer that it was her dream to go to Italy was left with a surprise $1,000 tip on Monday.

According to Tumblr blogger Casual Cynic, her mother has been working as a waitress for years and, after mentioning to the customer that she had an Italian family and eight years of art education but had never been to Italy, she got a big surprise.

More from GlobalPost: Kentucky man carries out brother’s pay-it-forward dying wish (VIDEO)

“This man who we have never seen before tipped her 1000 dollars for a trip to Italy. Walked out, not another word,” Casual Cynic wrote.

The unidentified blogger’s mother isn’t the first waitress to get a more than generous tip from a very kind customer. CeCe Bruce, who works at a Steak ‘n Shake restaurant in Indianapolis, got a $446 tip on a $5.97 bill from one of her regulars, known only as Miss Jo.

And Casual Cynic’s mother comes in second for the biggest tip to a Houston waiter who was handed $5,000 in cash from a couple — his regulars — who told him, “Go buy yourself a car.”

SEE ALSO: 19 Lottery Winners Who Blew It All

Please follow Your Money on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

Read the full article →

Russian Tycoons And State-Controlled Companies Are Footing The Bill For The Most Expensive Olympics In History

May 21, 2013

Sochi OlympicsSOCHI, Russia (AP) — The cost of the 2014 Winter Games in the Russian city of Sochi now stands at $51 billion, making it the most expensive Olympics in history.

More than half of the bill is being footed by Russian state-controlled companies and business tycoons. A look at what the major players are building in Sochi:

THE RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT

The government is building five of the six arenas in the coastal cluster, which will host indoor competitions such as ice skating, for about $10 billion. Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Kozak, who is overseeing the Sochi preparations, said the government will spend a total of about $18 billion before the games begin in February 2014.

GAZPROM

The world’s largest natural gas producer, a publicly traded company, has many Olympic projects in Sochi, including building a cross-country skiing and biathlon center, one of the three Olympic villages and an Alpine ski resort. Gazprom is also building a power station in a Sochi suburb for about $740 million and a pipeline to bring gas supplies to the Sochi area for about $1 billion. The total price tag for Gazprom stands at roughly $3 billion.

POTANIN

Metals tycoon Vladimir Potanin, whose fortune is estimated at $14.3 billion, started building the Roza Khutor ski resort before Sochi was picked to hold the 2014 Olympics. Infrastructure required by the International Olympic Committee cost $500 million, boosting his total bill in Sochi to $2.5 billion. In addition to the Alpine ski runs at Roza Khutor, Potanin’s holding company, Interros, has built an Olympic village and a snowboarding and freestyle park.

DERIPASKA

Metals tycoon Oleg Deripaska, estimated to be worth $8.5 billion, is mainly involved in infrastructure development in Sochi. His holding company, Basic Element, is building an Olympic village, a sea port and has just finished revamping the Sochi airport. Basic Element expects to spend a total of $1.4 billion in Sochi.

SBERBANK

The state-controlled bank is set to spend at least $1.3 billion building a media center in Sochi, as well as a ski jump complex.

Copyright (2013) Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Associated Press text, photo, graphic, audio and/or video material shall not be published, broadcast, rewritten for broadcast or publication or redistributed directly or indirectly in any medium. Neither these AP materials nor any portion thereof may be stored in a computer except for personal and non-commercial use. Users may not download or reproduce a substantial portion of the AP material found on this web site. AP will not be held liable for any delays, inaccuracies, errors or omissions therefrom or in the transmission or delivery of all or any part thereof or for any damages arising from any of the foregoing.

Please follow Sports Page on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

Read the full article →

Why Big Banks Don’t Want Your Money Anyway

May 21, 2013

divest from chase bank

With the recent backlash surrounding the banking industry, more consumers are becoming increasingly vocal about the poor service, high fees and dismal interest rates offered by the nation’s biggest banks and demanding justice.

Usually, when enough customers complain about a business, that business is inclined to make a change and regain the trust they’ve lost. It follows then, that if you’re dissatisfied by your bank, you should make your voice heard and request action. Unfortunately, big banks probably aren’t going to do much changing anytime soon, because frankly, they don’t want your business.

Big Banks Don’t Want Your Money

One of the major reasons banks aren’t interested in gaining new business is because most depositors are unprofitable.

One would assume that, considering lending out customers’ deposits is one of the major ways banks make money, the more cash sitting in bank accounts, the better. The truth, however, is that most big banks have more money on deposit than they know what to do with.

Bloomberg reported in December 2012 that deposits at U.S. banks exceeded loans by an “unprecedented” $2 trillion. In fact, deposits have increased by 29 percent since September 2008, while loans have experienced growth of less than 2 percent over the same time period.

Additionally, Bloomberg reported the banking industry was lending 78 cents for every $1 in deposits at of the end of last year, well below the mid-90 percent range the Royal Bank of Canada’s Gerard Cassidy states is ideal.

Ron Sellers of Grey Matter Research & Consulting explains, “Consumers don’t understand the finances of banking. They often say, ‘Well, you’re using my money, so you’re making money off me.’ What they don’t recognize is that servicing that account costs money.”

Those costs, says Sellers, include processing every transaction; producing and sending statements; and maintaining branches, ATMs and phone service centers. Plus, banks also have to keep a portion of deposits on reserve at all times. 

Therefore, it’s likely you are costing your bank more than you’re contributing to its bottom line — so it’s no wonder they aren’t going out of their way to make you happy. In fact, your bank might actually be trying to drive you away.

What Does a Profitable Bank Customer Look Like?

Alexey Bulankov, CFP, told me that a few years ago, he worked for the investment arm of a well-known bank as an investment consultant. The bank’s management decided to have branch managers compile a list of its most profitable accounts — defined as bringing in the highest percent of revenue per dollar of deposit.

“I was quite surprised when I saw the list,” says Bulankov. “It was compiled almost entirely of the low-balance accounts — under a $100 — which had low balances, high overdrafts and were systematically overdrawn, late or had a bunch of bounced checks,” he explains.

This was prior to the passing of the Dodd-Frank financial reform law, however, which in part limited the bank fees institutions could charge customers. Reuters cited Todd Maclin, head of consumer and business banking at JPMorgan Chase & Co, as explaining that people who couldn’t bring at least $100,000 in investable assets, loans and deposits to their banks would be largely unprofitable once Dodd-Frank passed.

Driving Away Unwanted Bank Customers

It’s important to remember that banks are, in fact, businesses, so their number one driving objective is to turn a profit. Today, bank fees make up a much smaller percentage of overall banking industry revenue. Financial institutions are using bank fees to drive away those customers who were once the most profitable, but now cost banks more than they’re worth to keep.

“In my experience, I was told by my management to manage out my highest loss ‘D’ households,” says Gregory B. Meyer, Community Relations Manager, Meriwest Credit Union. “In other words, find ways to encourage these customers to take their unprofitable business elsewhere. In business reviews, my boss would look at the lowest of the D households and directly ask me, ‘Why are these households still here?’”

Credit Unions Welcome the Business

Meyer explained that credit unions, on the other hand, have a very different perspective regarding customers. As not-for-profit institutions, their priorities aren’t driven by revenue.

“I think this is why, every year, credit unions tend to grow the number of households they service,” advises Meyers, adding, “A while back, Bank Transfer Day was a big day when families with bank checking accounts were encouraged to move to a credit union… Since then, every day our credit union is open is Bank Transfer Day.”

For the average person with a modest-size bank account, a symbiotic relationship with big banks is probably not possible. Even so, there are plenty of credit unions out there that would be more than happy to have you.

Please follow Your Money on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

Read the full article →